Website reviews used by watchdog
Care homes and homecare agencies that received bad reviews on a publicly created website will be risking their reputations as the health and social care watchdog begins using the website to inform its inspections.
The Good Care Guide, launched in February 2012, provides an opportunity to find, rate and review local care providers.
The site works like travel review website TripAdvisor.
From Tuesday the Care Quality Commission (CQC) will be using the website as a key part of its work.
Ben Black, director of Good Care Guide said: “The CQC has a hugely important job to do and we are pleased to support them in ensuring that high standards are maintained across the UK.
“Our reviews are honest and impartial, and depict the views of real people using care homes.
“People get no reward for leaving the reviews other than helping others looking for a care home so the CQC are wise to capitalise on this feedback to help form a judgement on the quality of a care home or home care agency.”
Recent analysis of the reviews on the site showed that care of older people was in particular need of improvement.
In April 2013, Good Care Guide’s reviews were selected by the Department of Health to help populate their new care comparison section of the NHS Choices website.
Paul Bate, CQC director of strategy & intelligence, said: “The views of the public are of paramount importance and this service helps bring people’s views about the quality of care services that people are receiving straight to the attention of our inspection teams. It is vital that wherever information is posted about the quality of care services, we get to hear about it.”
Have you referred to the Good Care Guide for their reviews?
Latest posts by Silversurfers Editor (see all)
Leave a Comment!
Community Terms & Conditions
These content standards apply to any and all material which you contribute to our site (contributions), and to any interactive services associated with it.
You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The standards apply to each part of any contribution as well as to its whole.
be accurate (where they state facts); be genuinely held (where they state opinions); and comply with applicable law in the UK and in any country from which they are posted.
Contributions must not:
contain any material which is defamatory of any person; or contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory; or promote sexually explicit material; or promote violence; promote discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age; or infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person; or be likely to deceive any person; or be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence; or promote any illegal activity; or be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety; or be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person; or be used to impersonate any person, or to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person; or give the impression that they emanate from us, if this is not the case; or advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.
Nurturing a safe environment
Our Silversurfers community is designed to foster friendships, based on trust, honesty, integrity and loyalty and is underpinned by these values.
We don't tolerate swearing, and reserve the right to remove any posts which we feel may offend others... let's keep it friendly!