Not a member?

You need to be a member to interact with Silversurfers. Joining is free and simple to do. Click the button below to join today!

Click here if you have forgotten your password
celtwitch
11th Sep 2016 17:35:59
-3
Thanks for voting!
I woz edjukated in a secondry modern skool, wots rong wiv that?
Response from Yodama made on 16th Oct 2016 10:16:33
Yeah! well I carent understand why peple dont talk and spell like wot I do. ( is it a full stop or commer ere)?
Response from Fruitcake13 made on 8th Sep 2017 21:06:12
Yeah, well thats gotter be the too bestest riplys to this qweschin so far I reckin.... 🙂
Response from Yodama made on 9th Sep 2017 08:10:47
Thank you for kind remark and that you thought it worthy of a mention. The remark was penned in haste and without any serious consideration nearly a year ago. I might mention that it was made directly after my full frontal lobotomy.
Response from Fruitcake13 made on 9th Sep 2017 19:13:52
My dear Yodama, methinks you have changed your moniker, but you are still your deliciously delightful self! As to your little photo thingy.....wooWHO! Tom B. certainly approves wholeheartedly....or rather wholeHEARTSedly, and he sends his love, or he will when he finds it, he thinks he left it somewhere and can't quite remember where. Nothing changes.... xxx
Response from Yodama made on 10th Sep 2017 13:15:54
Yes dear Fruitcake13, my moniker changed from Littleminx after somebody pointed out to me that it had connotations attached to loose and naughty women. Had to be changed at once, I am fairly rigid and would have found the looseness most disconcerting.

Thank you so much for the compliments you have bestowed upon this humble Starmaiden.

If I may say, it is a real pleasure to have your lovely and erudite self back on the horse and on these forums. Your mischievous humour was sorely missed.

Ah Tom, I did have a suspicion that you had both hied yourselves off somewhere together.
Your magnetic attraction for the dangerous Draconis would have him wanting to protect you.
Methinks he found the map he misplaced, ( much like his misplaced love) I am surprised and delighted to see you back in one piece.

I do believe he is or has been mentoring the new doctor. The new doctor looks fairly sensible so I don't think she is given to wild arm flinging and scarf flying behaviour. She may not at first take heed, well you know he is a bit...well I would not go so far as to say insane...there I have uttered it.
We hold out hope that Tom will find the love he searches galaxies and dimensions for at least before he reaches the tender age of 2000.
Glad to see you back xxx
Hateehc
16th Oct 2016 16:18:56
0
Thanks for voting!
Grammer schools are and always will be for middle class/upper class people. I didn't fail at school or pass the 11 plus because I was dull, I didn't pass the eleven plus because I was from a deprived back ground and back then the 11 plus was not geared towards intellect it was geared toward social back ground and knowledge. I failed at school because school failed me. Jpoined the Army at 16, took an IQ test and was found to have an IQ of 151.. so instead of being a car mechanic as I wished, was placed in the Intelligence Corps.. Like most things, in an ideal world, Grammer schools are a good idea, but in reality they are selective and unfair. EG 2 boys, one from a rich background with lots of money to buy books and have tuition, other from an abusive deprived background who is rarely fed and fears for his physical well being at home... the rich boy already has a head start, and the poor feral child, will despite every effort be regarded as inferior to the rich child
Response from Wilf made on 16th Oct 2016 16:50:32
I agree with most of what you say. We were very poor as kids but i was lucky enough to get enough o levels at 16 to go from a horrible comprehensive with 300 kids in a year to the local grammar school. 99% of the kids there came from rich families. i lived in jumble sale clothes by 17 some of them were driving in their own cars. My mum and dad weer too poor to have a car! BUT what it did show me was the education there was massively superior to the comprehensive school which was a joke. So the rich got educated and kept on being rich and the poor stayed the same. Not right! We MUST get all schools up to grammar school standard and fast.
Response from Hateehc made on 16th Oct 2016 16:56:16
I joined the Army at 16, I left school with 3 cse, 2 grade 3 1 grade 5... look at society today, look at the abuse that is still missed, look at the children living in poverty and in fear. Society says things to sound good, but effective actions are rarely implemented
Response from Wilf made on 11th Jan 2017 20:27:43
I think we need to get the education system up and bring all kids no matter how poor they are up to enjoy education. In many countries like China all kids are eager to learn...they know that getting an education will lift them out of poverty.
Response from Fruitcake13 made on 8th Sep 2017 20:55:12
Grammar schools, as they were in my day, were far from being only for the children of the middle class or upper class. As you had to pass the '11 plus' exam to get into a grammar school, it made no difference if you were the child of a doctor or the child of a street sweeper, all you had to do was pass the entrance exam. Less well-off parents were also given financial grants to provide the uniform etc. What's wrong with that system? It seems to me to be the fairest system ever.
Fruitcake13
8th Sep 2017 20:34:36
0
Thanks for voting!
I was educated in Scotland and at the time Scottish schools were either 'Senior Highs' or 'Junior Highs'. Senior High schools were the Scottish equivalent of English Grammar schools and Junior High schools were the Scottish equivalent of English secondary moderns. Only those who passed their '11 plus' were accepted for Senior High schools, and as I passed my '11 plus' that's where I was educated.

I'm in two minds about your question, johnwyth, as I know I got a first rate education at my school, but my younger brother, who went to what had been a Junior High because the '11 plus' had been scrapped by the time he was of age, didn't get anything like the education I had received.

Because of that, my husband and I paid for our own two children to go to an English Grammar school (by this time we weren't living in Scotland) as we wanted them to have as good an education as we had received, and the only way to do that was to send them to a fee paying Grammar. They both had to sit an entrance exam to be accepted by the school, as just being able to pay the fees was not enough to get accepted.

So, personally, I would like to see non fee paying Grammar schools return, as, whether you agree or not, all children have different abilities, and some are more able educationally than others. That is a fact of life, not a judgement. Being a little more educationally able doesn't make you a smarter or better person, nor will it make you any more successful in life, I know plenty of adults who are smart and successful but who were not educated at Grammar schools and I'm sure you do too.
John Walsh
13th Aug 2017 16:49:41
0
Thanks for voting!
I went to a public school from a council flat. The difference being that the school was catholic and I had an assisted place. I was shunned by some at the school because of my background, very friendly, but when their mother's found out I was from a council estate, there was little close contact with me socially. Indeed they were great friends with continental students who boarded rather than me. Echoes of remainers in Brexit! Same class, same prejudice!
Educationally, my school was not so far ahead of the local catholic comprehensives. I'd go as far as to say, that if I went to my local school, it wouldn't have made much difference, but I would have preferred to have gone there as most of my friends were there.
As a catholic child however, I didn't have a choice.
ecarg
12th Feb 2017 06:11:51
2
Thanks for voting!
Grammar schools are not just for the middle classes.My bother went to a Grammar school after passing the 11 plus,my sister sat the 11 plus and went to secondary school ,I was not allowed to sit the 11 plus as I was a nervous child and my teacher probably new i wouldn't pass anyway.I went 1 yr. to secondary school in England and 3yrs to an Academy in Scotland which was the same as a secondary school as far as I could tell.
Outcome Brother a retail business man
Sister an office manager
Me special needs support worker.
All of us home owners paying our taxes and law abiding citizens,
Therefore who's to say who had the best education?
Today the education system needs some simplification and the ability to gide children in various directions ,success takes many forms .Increased value on less academic routes I feel would encourage children to view careers differently. Who's to say my job was any less important than my brother and sisters? In fact I would say it was a good deal more important it just happened to have a small salary and unfortunately income supposedly measures success.No I say happiness ,job satisfaction and contentment with yo.ur lot is good for me.
CeeCeeUK
11th Jan 2017 15:01:02
3
Thanks for voting!
I was bright enough to pass the 11+ and attend a Grammar School but I was/am from a working class background; both my parents worked full-time and I was cared for by my Victorian (and very strict) grandmother. "Make do and mend" and "waste not want not" were very much golden rules of necessity for our family.

My teachers expected me to take my 'A' levels and then go on to University (which was a real achievement back then and not commonplace like now) but I had to leave at 16 and get a job to help my family financially. I left on the Friday and started full-time work on the following Monday. Being a Grammar school girl certainly helped me get a better job then, and I am very grateful for that.

I had to work hard at the Grammar School as the standards were initially very high, however, when our headmistress retired after 21 years of service, the replacement was appalling and the school went on a downward spiral. Many of the better teachers left and the handful of quality ones remaining did an excellent job against the odds in keeping most of us on track for a good education.

I'm not an expert on modern day education but I think that anything that encourages children to work hard to release their talents and put them on the correct path for success - be it academic or practical should be applauded.
Response from Wilf made on 11th Jan 2017 20:25:34
I was lucky enough to go to a grammar school as well at 16 having been in an appalling comprehensive with no discipline and little teaching. The difference is that 40 years on many of the guys at the grammar have done incredibly well...most of the comprehensive guys I still know have not. The system lets us down! We need to get the teaching standards up in the UK. Teachers are excellent by and large. They need more discipline and society needs to provide that in law. Too many girls are distracted by boys in class. If the boys do not want to learn discipline them or send them to special boys only schools
Response from Lionel made on 12th Jan 2017 00:07:45
I've kept out of this debate so far because I was privileged to have a London Public School education - not something I wanted, but it was required of me. Perhaps that disqualifies me from this thread. But I'll pitch in anyway.

Let's step back a moment away from the heat of yes or no debate and ask ourselves what we expect of education, both for ourselves and our families? Does anyone have an answer? Is one type of school better than another?

Surely, we expect schools to prepare people for life, to do for them what we cannot. They must end school literate, numerate and with a rounded view of the world they enter and life itself. It is about preparation for their workplace and for life.

But isn't the most important part of education to teach our youngsters how to think? How to silently perform a critical analysis of a TV advert, a salesman's pitch, or, indeed of another person? Is not the school's place to ensure pupils are literate, can communicate in standard English and be understood? Isn't education about widening a young mind's view beyond their environment and teaching them to look outward, to life in the raw and be prepared, before they enter that reality? I believe it is. In my rather humble opinion, if our education system, of whatever breed, comprehensive, grammar or otherwise, fails in these departments, or any others, then the kids have been failed.

Let's not be so hasty as to blame comprehensive schools - they were a Socialist dream, to make everyone the illiterate same; Let's not blame Grammar schools because they cleaved to standards then fast becoming unfashionable. And please, let's not sneer at public schools who do the job so many of us want from the State system.

Wilf, this evening I stand in admiration of you. From a difficult background you went on to beat the system and make good. Would it be patronising to say here, well done mate. If it is, I apologise. I too beat the system: always wanted to work on farms and in spite of my expensive education, did just that. A man from dirt poor families, only my father's greed for money made my education possible. But my education taught me how to think, how to smell a rat, and perhaps above all, how to live in a book I read. It taught me to silently analyse people, things whatever, and do mental arithmetic without moving my lips. It taught me to think!

I have four step grand children in the present State system. I find no recognisable identity between their education and mine. So, and I will get shot down in flames for this, ... instead of just re-creating Grammar schools, why not model the State system on an English Public school? Get real, tangible results from our money ... and include the disciplines of the same schools. Could be a shock to the snowflakes I have as step grand children! Yes, plan for and aim at the very best in education ... but it won't happen. Education is a political football.
rc47
7th Nov 2016 10:13:46
0
Thanks for voting!
I attended a grammar school, taught in both grammar and comprehensive schools and find it horrendous that, without any research or evidence, the prime minister wants to bring back a system that failed the majority of our generation. The grammar school I taught in, for example, admitted about 25% of the local area boys and the rest went to three different secondary modern schools, all of which were larger than ours. Thus, three quarters went to a school which started with the premise you were failures for that was what you had in common. No pupil ever transferred to us from those schools and their curriculum was very different: more practical and less academic. In some ways they were prepared for working life better than we were, but only for work in trades and other manual work. That was the assumption about the boys made by the system; it was rigid and inflexible. Do we really want that form of selection at 11 back again?
Response from jeanmark made on 7th Nov 2016 11:07:21
I have no strong views on either grammar and comprehensive schools but was interested that you had concerns about the latter focusing on more practical rather than academic achievement. I don't disagree with this but why then say "...they were prepared for working life better than we were, but only for work in trades and other manual work". I would have thought society needs all of these people and working in 'trade' or 'manual labour' surely shouldn't be viewed negatively. My father was a carpenter and I was proud he had a skill that created something.
Response from rc47 made on 7th Nov 2016 11:48:56
Of course we need trades people, jeanmark, especially if they are skilled, qualified and reliable. I would never be negative towards them. But my point was that if you failed your 11+ you had no choice but to move towards manual work. My wife failed her 11+, went to a sec mod and from the age of 12/13 it was expected she would become a typist [I think she was rejected from cookery!]. It was 30 years later when she gained an Open University degree that she showed she was as clever academically as I was: she just was not given the chance at school.
On the other hand I went to a grammar school where we were divided into arts and science students at the age of 14 and so were limited in that academic way.
I believe children should be given as many and as varied opportunities as possible; thus restricting them before they are 15/16 is iniquitous, and that's what selective education does. It's NOT just the return of the grammar schools Teresa May is promoting, but the concomitant return of the "sink" schools for the rest ... she just cannot be seen to say that.
Response from jeanmark made on 7th Nov 2016 12:03:21
Point taken rc47. I failed the 11+, was in a 'B' stream throughout and constantly compared to my two brighter sisters - they were in 'A' streams - and asked why I couldn't be as good as them. Fortunately I'm stubborn and despite my teachers predictions (they didn't think I would be clever enough to be a typist) I obtained professional qualifications and a degree and went on to have a long and successful career albeit in nursing rather than in medicine - my choice. I agree there are a number of us who are 'late' starters but even the present educational system appears to try to slot children into specific roles. Having said all that I don't have children so maybe don't really know what I'm talking about but that doesn't usually stop me!
Hateehc
16th Oct 2016 16:21:59
1
Thanks for voting!
Rather than creating boundaries teachers these days create friendships with pupils, it doesn't work
Margaret Hart
9th Sep 2016 21:02:54
1
Thanks for voting!
Most of us on here will be of the age of those who were educated at either Grammar Schools or Secondary Modern Schools so we have the great advantage of knowing how both systems plus the various modifications worked. I'm 69 and when I left school I went to college and others trained to do various jobs which were appropriate at the time.
At that time the boys tended to go for trades as it the main opinion was that they were jobs for them. If they didn't go to Uni girls trained to be secretaries, comp,operators, hairdressers etc - girls jobs. I spent most of the 4th year at junior school in hospital or ill at home and I only went back to school 1 week before the 11 plus and I only got an interview where 3 very stern looking people proceeded to ask me questions but I was terrified and couldn't answer any of them for all I knew the answers so I didn't get through but I knew then that I would carry on at college and do my exams there which I did and then attained my degree through the OU. I had a wonderful education at a Secondsry Modern school which I know was a particularly good one.

The education system didn't need radical changing it just needed improving but nobody even thought of that. If they want to bring that system back then they must concentrate on getting the standards right.
Some children are not meant for continuous studying they are better at doing things or caring for people which doesn't make them less intelligent just different and they therefore need different training. There are not as many trades to need apprentices as technology has moved on so much the work place is very different so both education and training need to be different. Apart from that of course there are a lot more people for fewer jobs and there is no escaping that problem.

Some say that the new system is working but if it is why are we dropping further and further in the worlds table of education.p
Response from Wilf made on 9th Sep 2016 21:25:55
Your comments are interesting and right as with technology there are bound to be fewer actual apprentices but then jobs need to change with the times and so does teaching. I do worry that government after government has messed about with teaching and the worse was labour getting rid of grammar schools in the 60s. I think Theresa Mays new idea that any school can be a grammar school is a great move forward. Bring standards up dont bring it all down to the lowest common denominator
ArchieUK
8th Sep 2016 08:15:10
3
Thanks for voting!
I never went to grammar school because I was not clever enough; but I have no jealousy about that, or those that went. I just went to one university, "the university of life". Let us have more grammar schools where those who have the luck to have more active brains can go forward and advance themselves and hopefully our country.









i
Response from Jordynhollie made on 9th Sep 2016 11:39:56
I have three granddaughters. They were not interested in taking the 11plus test and were quite happy to go the local secondary school. However the second girl suffered bullying when she was in year 9 and my daughter decided to remove here from that school. She was advised that her daughter's grades were good enough for grammar school so she applied and her daughter was accepted. She is required to work hard which has never been a problem for her but is now studying for her GCSE exams and has received A* and A's in her mocks. She admits that she wouldn't be doing as well if she had stayed at the secondary school.

The eldest stayed at the secondary school as she was happy there but they did not have a sixth form so at 16 she applied for the sixth form at the grammar school. She had received the necessary grades in her GCSE's for acceptance and is now in the final year of her A level studies. She hopes to go to university as she wishes to train to be a primary school teacher. Although she had been happy at the sec. school she says that what she has learnt in the last twelve months has been remarkable.

The youngest is 12 and also at sec. school. She is waiting for an available place at grammar .
The difference this school has made to the girls education is remarkable. They are all hard working girls and if children love to learn and want to get on in life they should be allowed this opportunity. I would add that neither myself or my daughter were clever enough to go to grammar school.
Response from Margaret Hart made on 9th Sep 2016 21:14:55
I agree about the University of Life for which one needs that great type of intelligence Common Scence. When I was young people could leave one job on s Friday and start a new one on a Monday as jobs were plentiful and experience was a great consideration.
Many people from then made a great success of their lives by hard work and original thinking. Quite a few with very poor backgrounds are now multi millionaires or at least very comfortably off but the work ethics were very different then as well - if people wanted to get on there was nothing within their power they wouldn't do to make it come true.

One of the biggest mistakes now is the moving of the retirement age to older as it should have been made earlier to release some jobs for younger people.
Loading more posts...
More Posts

Community Terms & Conditions

Content standards

These content standards apply to any and all material which you contribute to our site (contributions), and to any interactive services associated with it.

You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The standards apply to each part of any contribution as well as to its whole.

Contributions must:

be accurate (where they state facts); be genuinely held (where they state opinions); and comply with applicable law in the UK and in any country from which they are posted.

Contributions must not:

contain any material which is defamatory of any person; or contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory; or promote sexually explicit material; or promote violence; promote discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age; or infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person; or be likely to deceive any person; or be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence; or promote any illegal activity; or be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety; or be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person; or be used to impersonate any person, or to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person; or give the impression that they emanate from us, if this is not the case; or advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.

Nurturing a safe environment

Our Silversurfers community is designed to foster friendships, based on trust, honesty, integrity and loyalty and is underpinned by these values.

We don't tolerate swearing, and reserve the right to remove any posts which we feel may offend others... let's keep it friendly!