image

Should Page 3 in The Sun end now?

After ensuring that most of the national and international press, including its own sister paper The Times, were sufficiently convinced of Page 3’s demise on Monday, it appears today that this was just a ruse, and the topless models seem to have been reinstated.

The campaign group ‘No More Page 3’, which began in 2012 and attracted 217,000 signatures to a petition calling for a ban, acknowledged that “the fight might be back on”.

Over the past three days, there have been no topless models on Page 3, fuelling speculation the feature was on its way out.

Topless models were first introduced by the Sun in 1970, less than a year after Rupert Murdoch bought the title.

In recent years, the paper has faced growing criticism from campaigners who said the feature was out of date in the modern world.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said editors were free to publish “what they like”.

But Page Three was not “in keeping with the way in which women both want to be and should be represented”, he added on LBC radio.

What are your views?  Has The Sun got some catching up to do in a society that is striving for equality?

Should Page 3 in the Sun end now?

744 people have already voted, what's your opinion? Yes No

What are your views on this?

We'd love to hear your comments

Not a member?

You need to be a member to interact with Silversurfers. Joining is free and simple to do. Click the button below to join today!

Click here if you have forgotten your password
malmar58
29th Apr 2015
0
Thanks for voting!
this is the dam feminst lot
nagonthenet
2nd Mar 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
Why have they never (I don't think) had a bloke on page 3?
mercury
29th Jan 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
Page 3 is no longer shocking or a cause for moral outrage, sadly. When so-called celebrities flaunt their half naked (and naked) plastic bodies all over the papers and attend award ceremonies with most of their flesh on display, we do no more than glance. At least the Sun is honest enough to display these women openly as simple titillation (no pun intended). As for people who seem to think the women are being exploited and objectified - if they can show me proof they have been tortured, drugged, forcibly coerced or blackmailed into posing I'll be the first to complain. In what way are their career choices, tacky as they might be, different from a woman shoving her silicone naked oily bum in our faces or a has-been soap star wearing a dress cut down to her navel?
janetoloughlin
29th Jan 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
Yes get rid of. I can't see what it has to do with news. Mind you the sun is a gossip tabloid anyway that is why it does so well. I can only see the page 3 model has no moral standards and you could have more gossip.
clio53uk
26th Jan 2015
4
Thanks for voting!
You dont need to look
HJR58
26th Jan 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
I don't this it's as simple as being offensive. These images objectify women. Some people who look at them would complain if they saw a woman openly breast feeding in public. I think they are well past their 'sell by' date!
GrannyR
23rd Jan 2015
5
Thanks for voting!
No I'm 61 but don't find it offensive, I only see it very occasionally when given a paper but if it offends, don't buy the paper!
Laurabeth46
23rd Jan 2015
5
Thanks for voting!
Must admit, never read the Sun so was never a problem
thereseandray
23rd Jan 2015
1
Thanks for voting!
It's very definitely outdated now. Replace the page with careers of young women these days.
sheilavee
23rd Jan 2015
4
Thanks for voting!
Harmless. There is a lot worse on the internet.
Munsterlander
22nd Jan 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
I think, if you don't like it don't buy it, simple.
Wilf
22nd Jan 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
Yes I do think they should pull page 3...good for the 70s and 80s...looks outdated and a bit dumb now
Archiebald
22nd Jan 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
I think its outdated now...bit like the saucy postcards you used to get at the seaside. I do think Mr Murdoch has been very clever with his PR on this as every media organisation has been commenting on it and even Silversurfers has it!

Community Terms & Conditions

Content standards

These content standards apply to any and all material which you contribute to our site (contributions), and to any interactive services associated with it.

You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The standards apply to each part of any contribution as well as to its whole.

Contributions must:

be accurate (where they state facts); be genuinely held (where they state opinions); and comply with applicable law in the UK and in any country from which they are posted.

Contributions must not:

contain any material which is defamatory of any person; or contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory; or promote sexually explicit material; or promote violence; promote discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age; or infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person; or be likely to deceive any person; or be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence; or promote any illegal activity; or be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety; or be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person; or be used to impersonate any person, or to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person; or give the impression that they emanate from us, if this is not the case; or advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.

Nurturing a safe environment

Our Silversurfers community is designed to foster friendships, based on trust, honesty, integrity and loyalty and is underpinned by these values.

We don't tolerate swearing, and reserve the right to remove any posts which we feel may offend others... let's keep it friendly!