Is taxation the answer or is awareness going to reduce our sugar consumption?

image
Print Friendly

The British Medical Association is advising that sugary drinks should be taxed at 20 per cent to tackle the obesity crisis.

But will additional tax on these drinks actually make a difference to consumption, or is it awareness that will make people change their drinking habits?  When we hear about sugary drinks, our initial thinking may be directed towards fizzy drinks consumed mainly by children, however, when you look at the chart below, you may be surprised about the large amount of sugar contained in some of these drinks.

SUGAR

This graphic shows how many teaspoons of sugar are in each of the fizzy drinks and sugar-laden juices above

Most of us know that that Britons are consuming far too much sugar and doctors link this to a rise in illnesses such as diabetes. Somehow, we need to make a shift back to drinking more water and less processed products, so is increasing tax the answer.  Shouldn’t manufacturers of these products take some responsibility and just stop producing these harmful products?

The BMA, which represents 153,000 doctors, is seeking a ban on advertising unhealthy food and drink around children’s television programmes and an end to the marketing of sweets by children’s TV characters. But why make these products in the first place?

Should sugary foods and drinks carry a cigarette-style warning pictures to highlight the risk they pose to children’s health and teeth?

What are your views? Is additional taxation on these drinks going to make a difference to consumption? Could awareness of sugar content be more effective than taxation? Is there enough awareness of how much sugar is hidden in these drinks? Is it time to rethink what is actually manufactured and sold? Is it time for us to advocate for something different?

Is there enough awareness of how much sugar is hidden in these drinks?

330 people have already voted, what's your opinion? Yes No

What are your views?

We'd love to hear your comments

Not a member?

Join the silversurfers community today! It's free, easy to do, and is packed full of features and amazing offers!

Join the community!
Click here if you have forgotten your password
123Siobhan
18th Aug 2015
0
Thanks for voting!
People need to be educated about food and what is good and bad for us, and use the saying a 'little of what you fancy does you good', but add on an excess of what you fancy will give you type 2 diabetes, obesity, and eventually kill you.
Taxation is not the answer as the money would not go back into educating people. Food education should begin at home, but in many cases that is where the problem starts. So it would have to be at school, which is an added burden on the teachers. There is no easy answer.
SHOEFLY
8th Aug 2015
0
Thanks for voting!
I cannot understand how people cannot be aware that these drinks are liquid sugar.
lizfid3
3rd Aug 2015
0
Thanks for voting!
More taxation? What will this lot tax next? Fresh air? We know the foods which have high sugar content and can surely choose whether or not to buy them for ourselves and our children. No amount of taxation will stop the sale of these foodstuffs, it's down to the manufacturers to step up to the mark and the individuals to take responsibility for their choices.
HJR58
1st Aug 2015
0
Thanks for voting!
I think all high sugar food and drink should be heavily taxed.
little owl
31st Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
I don't think there is anything like enough awareness of the amount of sugar in all foods not just the sweet drinks. Taxation will make very little difference as children often buy their own drinks and they will just pay the extra and do without other things if they don't have enough and parents do a weekly shop and will still buy the usual amount of drinks possibly making a show of changing at first but then slipping back into the same old habits as time is always short.
nome
31st Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
Those who indulge in too much sugar will do it regardless of warnings.
wiffler
31st Jul 2015
1
Thanks for voting!
Tax sugar at source.
teamking
23rd Jul 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
Surely we should all know by now what has sugar and what has not? Chocolate, sweets, fizzy drinks, deserts, biscuits, etc are well known,obvious, sugar laden items and it is up to us,as individuals, to reduce / stop taking these things. The real issue is added sugar to things that would be regarded as savory foods plus,another issue is supermarkets stacking fruit drinks along side or mixed in with fruit juices. The former is stacked full of added sugar.
Marylyn Daley
21st Jul 2015
1
Thanks for voting!
We have the rights to know how much sugar is being added to our drinks.We don't need our fruit drinks to be dosed in sugar.it is unhealthy for teeth.Sugary drinks rots teeth,children's teeth are widely affected.
jeaniembe
20th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
Unhealthy drinks should plainly have to show how many teaspoons of sugar in the product, then the information could not be avoided. I don't think taxation would be the answer as people who want them would still buy them. People still buy cigarettes, although they apparently can cost up to £10 per pack.
JayneW2
19th Jul 2015
-1
Thanks for voting!
I never drink any of this muck, the only drinks I consume that are fattening are wind and beer.
JayneW2
19th Jul 2015
0
Thanks for voting!
jeaniembe
20th Jul 2015
1
Thanks for voting!
Perhaps the beer gives you the wind ! Cheers to you...
recycledteen
17th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
Why do we need all the sugar in drinks? I worry about sweetners and other additives.
I try to make our own drinks because I know what is in them. It is easy to make lemonade and water is easily obtainable. If we continue to buy drinks they will continue to sell them additives as well.
Munsterlander
14th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
Looking at how unhealthy all these are I think the government should do something. It has with fags so why not drinks????
Marley444
14th Jul 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
I was quite shocked by this chart. It just goes to show it isn't just the youngsters who have to watch what they drink. I think they should label drinks with numbers of spoons of sugar per serving as this is far clearer
MrFred
13th Jul 2015
3
Thanks for voting!
It's the drinks that deliberately brand themselves to look healthy that I find abhorrent.

To take an example from above: "The Juicy Water" uses branding and their name (the incorporation of the word water) to deliberately beguile the consumer into thinking they are choosing the healthy option. It's deceptive and should be addressed by the government bodies to be misleading, and, in my opinion, dangerous to the consumer making the convenience purchase!

The nature of these products is to provide a drink in an environment where you probably don't have time to study the ingredients, so I think we all fall victim to relying on the message the packaging, and name, conveys.

Maybe restrictions should be put in place to combat this. All drinks with a sugar content higher than X are enforced to have a red lid, or pull tab. All drinks with a sugar content lower than X could be allowed (by trading standards) to use a lid or pull tab that is green, for example.
3
Thanks for voting!
I think you make some very good points Mr Fred ... I have had The Juicy Water, thinking that it was a healthy option, and am shocked at how much sugar it has!! 🙁
susie226
13th Jul 2015
1
Thanks for voting!
I think that drinks manufactures should put the amount of sugar on their packages as teaspoons not calories, at least children would be more aware of the amount if sugar in the drink.
Princesbold
13th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
As a diabetic I have learnt to steer clear of all the tested products, however the test has missed out fresh juices. The sugar content of fresh juices might come as an even greater surprise!
Wilf
13th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
I agree. I used to drink a lot of Juices from M&S for example thinking it was very good for me but my wife always said they had huge sugar content so I stay away from all these types of drinks now
Wilf
13th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
I was amazed when I saw this chart about how much sugar is in drinks....I think its also down to the manufacturers to lower the amounts BUT NOT to put in sweet additives that are probably even more harmful. I have been gradually putting less and less sugar in my tea over the years and now just dip the tip of the spoon in it and it tastes fine. We should wean ourselves off all this sugar and the manufacturers should put in BIG BOLD writing how much sugar drinks contact. They are duty bound to do this. All the directors of these companies have kids as well don't they?
jeaniembe
20th Jul 2015
2
Thanks for voting!
I agree, sugar should be reduced in products and not be replaced with alternatives. Sweetness is an acquired taste and you can wean yourself off it. I used to take sugar in tea, now I couldn't drink it with sugar. Ugh !

Community Terms & Conditions

Content standards

These content standards apply to any and all material which you contribute to our site (contributions), and to any interactive services associated with it.

You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The standards apply to each part of any contribution as well as to its whole.

Contributions must:

be accurate (where they state facts); be genuinely held (where they state opinions); and comply with applicable law in the UK and in any country from which they are posted.

Contributions must not:

contain any material which is defamatory of any person; or contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory; or promote sexually explicit material; or promote violence; promote discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age; or infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person; or be likely to deceive any person; or be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence; or promote any illegal activity; or be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety; or be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person; or be used to impersonate any person, or to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person; or give the impression that they emanate from us, if this is not the case; or advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.

Nurturing a safe environment

Our Silversurfers community is designed to foster friendships, based on trust, honesty, integrity and loyalty and is underpinned by these values.

We don't tolerate swearing, and reserve the right to remove any posts which we feel may offend others... let's keep it friendly!

More Speakers Corner

Do you boil your Brussels? Cleaned brussel sprouts on a wooden cutting board with exterior leaves and a knife.
Brussels sprouts are a Christmas dinner must have but not to everyone likes them. You'll be...
Real or Artificial - What kind of Christmas tree will you have? Fresh cut Christmas trees
Each Christmas there is a ‘debate’ over real versus artificial Christmas trees. The...
Do you agree with Cryogenic Preservation? Excess smoky nitrogen gas discharge during filling of a liquid nitrogen dewar.
This week it was announced that a very brave 14 year old girl who had terminal cancer had won...
Should shops remain closed on Boxing Day? Boxing Day Sale cinnamon star on green wood concept.
A petition calling for a ban on shops opening on Boxing Day has attracted close to 194,000...
Will you be sending Christmas cards this year? Bracknell, England - October 28th, 2014: Vintage style Christmas cards. Modern cards originated from a printing in 1843 instigated by Sir Henry Cole, director of London's Victoria and Albert Museum.
The custom of sending Christmas cards was started in the UK in 1843 by Sir Henry Cole. He was a...
Do you still use cheques as payment? Signing a blank cheque with a fountain pen
** Note: Shallow depth of field
Cheques books have been used in the UK for over 350 years but they are now on the decline. In...
Are you surprised that Donald Trump won? Saint Louis, MO, USA - March 11, 2016: Donald Trump addresses supporters at the Peabody Opera House in Downtown Saint Louis
After months of campaigning, debating, mud slinging and scandals, the Americans have voted and...
Do you mind the gap? toblerone
The makers of Toblerone, Mondelez, have taken the decision to widen the gaps between the...
Should Nigel Farage be ennobled in the House of Lords? LONDON, UK - MAY 1, 2016: Nigel Farage seen arriving at the BBC to attend the Andrew Marr show
There are calls for Nigel Farage to be made a Lord and take his place as a peer in the upper...
Should the FA defy the poppy ban? poppy
England are due to host Scotland at a World Cup qualifying match at Wembley on November 11 ...
Who would you trust more to be the next US President? LONDON UK - MARCH 3RD 2016: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump pin badges over the American flag symbolizing their battle to become the next President of the United States 3rd March 2016.
With the latest results today from ABC/Washington Post tracking poll, now showing Donald Trump...
Should the UK have a complete ban on selling Ivory products? ivoryburn2 900x600
Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, chef come wildlife campaigner, has been looking into the shocking...
Do you think Princess Beatrice and Eugenie should be given royal duties? London UK - June 17 2006: Princess Eugenie (left) and Princess Beatrice seating on the Royal Coach at Trooping the colour ceremony also known as the Queen's Birthday Parade
** Note: Slight blurriness, best at smaller sizes
It was revealed in the sunday papers that there is a nasty feud brewing between Prince Charles and...
Do you rake or vacuum? Yorkshire Dog on the autumn leaves blur
Autumn is in full swing, and the leaves are rapidly changing from luscious shades of green, to a...
Where do you think the extra runway should be built - Heathrow or Gatwick? Airplane touch down on runway during sunset
Since the 1970s various UK governments have been debating how to expand the UKs potential to...
Are the Government right to do a Pension U-turn? bigstock-Pensions-11274911
The government has done a huge U-turn on Pensions and scrapped the rights of 5 million pensioners...
Do city zoos still have a place in a modern society? gorilla in zoo
Last week’s incident at London Zoo, in which a male silverback gorilla escaped his enclosure...
Are hospital trusts cashing in on the sick? Ticket machine at the exit of a car park
Patients in England are being penalised with increasing parking charges with 30% of hospital...
Is BA trying to pull the wool over our eyes? BARCELONA SPAIN - DECEMBER 11: A British Airways Airbus A320 taking off on December 11 2014 in Barcelona. British Airways is the international airline of Great Britain with its headquarters in London.
Last week British Airways proudly announced that they will be partnering with Marks & Spencer...
Are we being ripped off? TERRY'S CHOCLATE ORANGE
It seems to happen every year now, that chocolate manufacturers start messing with our favourite...